The phrase "One in, one out deal" can refer to different contexts depending on where it's used (e.g., immigration, business regulation, sports, etc.). But the most common and notable context—especially in UK politics and policy—relates to regulation management.
📘 "One In, One Out" Policy (Regulation Context)
This is a government rule that says:
"For every new regulation introduced, one existing regulation must be removed."
🎯 Purpose:
To control or reduce the total number of government regulations
To cut "red tape" for businesses and individuals
To encourage a simpler and more efficient regulatory environment
🔍 Example: United Kingdom (UK)
The UK government introduced this policy during David Cameron’s time as Prime Minister (2010s), with the goal of making the UK more business-friendly and cutting bureaucratic burdens.
Variants of the Policy:
One-In, One-Out (OIOO) – Introduced in 2011
One-In, Two-Out (OITO) – Toughened version (2013): For every new rule, two had to go.
One-In, Three-Out (OITO++) – Even stricter (2016): For every new regulation, three old ones needed to be removed.
These policies mainly applied to business-related regulations, not things like health and safety or national security.
✅ Benefits (Supporters Say):
Encourages regulatory discipline
Reduces burden on businesses
Stimulates economic growth
Prevents over-regulation
❌ Criticism (Opponents Say):
May lead to removal of important protections (e.g., environmental or labor regulations)
Quantity over quality: Not all regulations are equal — removing three small rules to add one big one may not be a fair trade
Could hamper necessary reforms in areas like climate change, tech, and public health
🧾 Summary:
The "One in, one out" deal is a regulatory policy where governments commit to removing one existing rule for every new one they introduce. Its goal is to reduce bureaucracy, but critics argue it can undermine necessary protections and oversimplify complex policymaking.
This is in News
The "one in one out" deal is intended to act as a deterrent against migrants attempting to make the treacherous English Channel crossing in small boats. It proposes that, for each migrant the UK returns to France, another migrant with a strong case for asylum in the UK will come in return.
